Probability full marks come from modelling: define events → partition/tree → apply definition/Bayes/counting → keep exact fractions. Statistics (mean/variance) uses the same clean table habit.
Portion AlgebraFocus High; Bayes + counting joins appear every few papersTarget 60–90sPortion share 37.2%Trend Falling share
Official syllabus includes total probability, Bayes, and P&C-based probability, plus mean and variance ideas. Never start with a formula name — start with the sample-space story. Probability marks follow the model; formulae only finish a correct tree or table.
How Advanced asks this
Bayes / total probability story stems
Conditional probability with clear P(A|B)
Independence checks in MC
Counting-based probability
Mean and variance of a discrete RV
Traps that leak marks
Assuming independence without check
Confusing ME with independence
Forgetting priors in Bayes
Variance = E(X²) only
Treating mutually exclusive as independent (or the reverse)
Shipping E(X²) as variance
Different counting models in num vs den of a probability
01. Most wrong answers are model errors, not arithmetic. A tree forces mutually exclusive routes that cover the experiment.
02. Independence ≠ mutually exclusive. Write the test P(A∩B)=P(A)P(B) when MC claims independence.
03. Counting probability: build the P&C model sentence first (see P&C notes), then divide favourable by total.
04. For discrete random variables: make the value table, compute E(X) and E(X²), then Var=E(X²)−[E(X)]².
05. Advanced lane: Bayes is almost always a tree or a partition table. Draw the first split (cause / type / bag) before writing any formula — then Bayes is arithmetic on those leaves.
06. Counting-probability joins: freeze the same model sentence for numerator and denominator. Changing ‘order matters’ mid-stem is how multi-correct clusters die.
07. Random variable stems: build the value→probability table first; E(X), E(X²), Var follow mechanically. Never jump to Var without E(X²).
Official · 2026
Syllabus for this topic
Official syllabus points for Probability & Statistics only — not the full Algebra portion map. Portion hub: Algebra · Algebra analysis.
Syllabus on this page is topic-scoped: Probability & Statistics. The parent portion (Algebra) also covers other topics — use the portion hub for the full map.
Topic match inside parent portion Algebra (37.2% of Math tags). Stats below are portion backdrop; matched subtopics show where Probability & Statistics sits.
Portion share37.2%
TrendFalling share
Study intensityCore · daily
Avg / year12.86
This topic in papers
Probability — 18 tagged (20% of Algebra)20:321:222:223:524:225:226:2
Statistics — 4 tagged (4.4% of Algebra)23:124:125:126:1
Portion-wide type/difficulty mix lives on the Algebra analysis — not repeated here so this page stays on Probability.
Advanced rarely asks a chapter in isolation. These are tagged multi-idea Math stems that touch Probability & Statistics — practise the knowledge bridge, not only the single-chapter drill.
No tagged mixed stem matched this topic’s keywords yet. Still revise the joins listed under Trends, and scan the mixed joins board for Calculus / Coordinate / Algebra bridges.
Probability marks leak on wrong models, not wrong arithmetic. These methods make you draw the story first — so Bayes and counting stop feeling like lucky guesses.
01
Tree first
If the tree is right, Bayes is arithmetic. If you skip the tree, marks become luck.
Do thisDraw 2–3 branch tree with priors and conditionals before naming Bayes.
Why it works
Makes the denominator of Bayes automatic.
See it once
Two factories 60%/40%, defect 2%/5% → P(A|def)=(0.012)/(0.032)=3/8.
02
Model sentence for counting-P
Keeps numerator and denominator in the same counting world — the #1 P&C-probability leak.